About The Books of The Bible

Endorsements

Comparisons

Sample Books

Questions & Answers

Reading Plans

Resources


Order Here



Tuesday, January 22, 2008

Ursula’s Plea

The current issue of Harper’s Magazine (Feb 2008) features an article by Ursula Le Guin called “Staying Awake: Notes on the alleged decline of reading.” What we read here is right in line with what we explored earlier with C.S. Lewis’ comments about ‘receiving’ a book rather than ‘using’ it. Le Guin’s contention is that it’s no surprise not everyone is up to reading:

“In its silence, a book is a challenge: it can’t lull you with surging music or deafen you with screeching laugh tracks or fire gunshots in your living room; you have to listen to it in your head. A book won’t move your eyes for you the way images on a screen do. It won’t move your mind unless you give it your mind, or your heart unless you put your heart into it. It won’t do the work for you. To read a story well is to follow it, to act it, to feel it, to become it—everything short of writing it, in fact.”

Entering into a story on its own terms. Imagine. Giving a story your mind—more, your heart. A two-way set of expectations. Not just readers with their requirements, but stories looking for good readers. Readers who honor the covenant between author and audience. Le Guin continues, “Reading is not ‘interactive’ with a set of rules or options, as games are; reading is actual collaboration with the writer’s mind.”

This is as far away from our snippet-searching, give-me-a-verse-for-today typical Bible ‘use’ (one can’t really call it reading) as it could be.

Ursula Le Guin, advocate for mo’ betta reading.

-Glenn

4 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Hey Glenn,

I just finished reading that article a few days ago and thought it was great. I like your concluding remark: "This is as far away from our snippet-searching, give-me-a-verse-for-today typical Bible ‘use’ (one can’t really call it reading) as it could be." You are dead-on and it frustrates me to no end when I see believers (even so-called mature believers) engage in such an approach to God's Word.

BTW, it might be out of place to ask it here, but what font size and paper weight is this BoTB TNIV?

Thanks,

Paul

February 8, 2008 12:41 AM  
Blogger Paul said...

From John Dunham, project manager for TBoTB:
24 lb. White Bible paper, 1280 PPI
9.75 (font) on 11.75 (leading)

February 8, 2008 2:58 PM  
Anonymous Tim Darling said...

Thanks for posting the whole conversation on Face Book. I don't have a Face Book account, so I was not a part of the event. However, I would like to add my thoughts on possible editions. I like the four movement editions of the NT. I also like the idea of releasing the First Testament in portions comparable to the original Jewish collections. As a Bible teacher, I like being able to take sections larger than a book but smaller than the whole thing and keep them logically united. Good discussion.

May 29, 2008 1:13 PM  
Anonymous Tim Darling said...

Sorry, also meant to say that I heartily endorse and look forward to every single book of the Bible presented in its own right. I like Amos and Kingdom Come, Kingdom Go. I am terribly thankful for a gospel other than John being presented "loose." The suggestion of Philemon in an envelope is wonderful. So, groupings, yes, but individual books, definitely!

May 29, 2008 1:41 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home